The New Dirty Little Secret; CT Scans are Dangerous to your Health

· Politics
Authors

On July 31, 2010 the New York Times published a report of hundreds of patients across several states who have been suffering the after effects of radiation overdose after a CT scan of the head. Most of these people suffered hair loss that matches the exact width of the scan. Many of the victims have also reported other symptoms of excessive radiation like nausea and vomiting. Apparently, the computer system that controls the amount of radiation emitted in the devices that are currently allows the operator wise latitude in setting the intensity of the exposure. Therefore, the consumers are being subjected to a high risk to harmful effects of radiation without their knowledge. 

Furthermore, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials have received reports of radiation damage caused by CT scans and have done nothing. State regulators seem to powerless because the against whom victims filed complaints hospitals have claimed that they did not make any errors, thus indicating that they exposed their patients to dangerous levels of radiation on purpose without the patients’ knowledge and consent. In one case a hospital in California had increased the radiation exposure 13 times greater than the manufacturer’s safe-level recommendation in order to get clearer pictures.  

This situation is an outrage and is clearly a case of criminal negligence on a massive scale. It is also a violation of patients’ rights to arbitrarily cause such dangerous exposure without their knowledge and consent and without proper medical justification such as eradicating malignant tumors. The fact that it is happening on such a wide scale with no government intervention is stunning. What is even more shameful is that the named hospital officials are refusing to take responsibility for their assaults. The Associated Press reported that several hospitals in California stated that they have been using GE Health’s dosage level recommendations in the cases where the CT scans caused radiation damage.  Finally, the FDA’s response to all of this chaos was to issue an alert to all hospitals to check their scanner radiation settings, which is stupid since the hospitals are denying that there were any mistakes and that the technicians used the settings set by the radiology department heads. Certainly, the fact that there are so many incidents of radiation poisoning in so many different hospitals suggests that the problem rests with the design of the device and with a lack of understanding among decision makers as to what is a safe versus risky level of radiation. Presently, radiological experts are dumbfounded and government officials are ineffectual. 

In conclusion, we have a new scandal that seems to be receiving very little attention in the press with no palpable response from the public or from government officials. Until a couple of days ago people believed that CT scans were safe and used less radiation than X-rays. Now we are finding out that the opposite is true and that thousands of people are needlessly suffering hair loss, nausea and vomiting and the possibility of developing brain cancer. The hospital managers are telling the investigative reporters that they were either following manufacturer’s recommendations, or that they made choices in certain cases to increase the radiation dosage to get clearer images. In this writer’s professional opinion, it seems that the culprits to a large extent are the management personnel at GE Health and the officials at the FDA. Regarding the former, there apparently aren’t sufficient safeguards in the programming by which the technicians set the level of radiation exposure. Concerning the later, the FDA officials are refusing to establish safe radiation parameters and order a recall of the CT scanning devices to cause GE and other manufacturers to prevent technicians from being able to go beyond the acceptable dose range. Moreover, we need to have a legal standard of patient safety which prohibits over exposing the patients with criminal penalties for non-compliance. 

Other Internet Media Sources 

Related blogs about ct scan radiation overdose Two more hospitals report CT scan radiation overdoses – NewsPlurk 

Unforgivable medical errors, revisited : Respectful Insolence Brain Scan Radiation Overdoses More Widespread Than Previously … 

Radiation Overdoses and Regulatory Ineptness :: DC Medical … Medical watch: Radiation overdose exposures expanding « Altaloman … 

Boston Medical Malpractice?: CT Brain Perfusion Scans Can Cause … NY Medical Malpractice Video Tutorials: Brain CT (CAT) Scan … 

Calif hospitals used manufacturer CT scan settings | Washington … Calif hospitals used manufacturer CT scan settings – KCOY Santa … 

Ct scan overdose california – Ct overdose california – Imac 2010 … Overexposure to Radiation During CT Scans? :: Drug Injury Lawyer Blog 

The difficulty of regulating x-ray radiation in the ER | KevinMD.com After Stroke Scans, Patients Face Serious Health Risks / Defeat … 

ThePopTort: GE’s Killer Tests The Medical Quack: Radiation Over Exposure Investigation Efforts … 

Twitter Trackbacks for The Radiation Boom – After Stroke Scans … Reduced Radiation CT Scans « Jon Barron’s Natural Health Blog 

Patients at serious risk after hospitals overdose stroke scans … Indian Holocaust My Father`s Life and Time: Fwd … 

New Details Emerge in CT Scan Radiation Overdose Scandal « NEWS Gate The Anti-Yale 

Two more hospitals report CT scan radiation overdoses – LA Blog Alabama Woman Files Suit Over Ct Scan Radiation Overdose 

General Electric and Toshiba medical radiation scans overdoses … Radiation, radiation overdose, CT Scans, FDA, medical malpractice … 

CT Radiation Overdose Scandal Worse Than First Thought | 24-7-news.com MD Whistleblower: CT Scan Risks: Radiation Danger and Overuse … 

Two more hospitals report CT scan radiation overdoses | XJwebs …  PROTECT YOURSELF FROM EXCESSIVE RADIATION DURING CT SCANS … CT Brain Scan Radiation Overdoses More Frequent Than Thought

1 Comment

Comments RSS
  1. 300 yrs in America

    I was told that one CT was the equivalent of 250 xrays at once. i’m not at liberty to say who told me this as it would expose my secret identity. suffice it to say i see him on Fri. night. he is an expert.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: